Spot Delivery

Free Consultation Avavailable

GET YOUR FREE CONSULTATION
CALL NOW:855-978-6564
Practice Areas
Free Case Evaluation

Fill out the form below for a free, confidential case evaluation and we will contact you shortly. All fields are required.

    Full Name*

    Email*

    Phone*

    Describe your case briefly

    How to Spot a Spot Delivery (Yo-Yo Financing) Case

    When you buy or lease a vehicle, you expect the deal to be final once you drive off the lot. Unfortunately, some dealerships engage in “spot delivery” (also known as yo-yo financing) — a deceptive practice where they let you leave with the car before financing is truly approved. Days or weeks later, they call you back claiming financing “fell through” and pressure you into signing new terms.

    This practice is not only unfair — it may violate state laws, federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA) requirements, and consumer protection statutes.

    One-Contract vs. Two-Contract Spot Delivery Cases

    Understanding the difference between one-contract and two-contract cases is critical:

    One-Contract Case

    • You signed only one Retail Installment Sales Contract (RISC).

    • Dealer claims financing fell through but keeps the contract “open” or modifies terms without a proper new contract.

    • May involve false backdating of disclosures or improper handling of TILA-required information.

    Two-Contract Case

    • Dealer had you sign a second RISC after claiming financing was denied on the first one.

    • Often, the second contract has worse terms: higher interest rate, larger down payment, longer term, or extra add-ons.

    • Courts frequently view this as deceptive because the first contract was binding — the second contract often violates TILA or state law.

    How to Prove a Spot Delivery Case

    To prove a yo-yo financing case, documentation is everything. Key evidence includes:

    • Copies of all contracts you signed (first and second RISCs, if applicable)

    • Retail Installment Sales Contract disclosures — look for differences in APR, monthly payment, or term

    • Dates on the contracts (dealers sometimes backdate to cover violations)

    • Any conditional delivery agreements or “We Owe” documents the dealer provided

    • Communications with the dealer — calls, texts, voicemails, or letters demanding you return and re-sign

    • Proof of payments made (especially if made under both contracts)

    Truth in Lending Act (TILA) Explanation

    The Truth in Lending Act (TILA) requires auto finance contracts to clearly disclose:

    • Annual Percentage Rate (APR)

    • Finance charges

    • Amount financed

    • Total payments

    • Payment schedule

    When dealers use spot delivery to trick consumers into signing multiple contracts, they often violate TILA because:

    • Required disclosures weren’t provided at the correct time

    • The first contract’s disclosures were false or misleading

    • A second contract changed terms without lawful rescission of the first

    These violations can give rise to statutory damages, actual damages, and attorney’s fees.

    What Damages Can Be Recovered?

    Victims of spot delivery may be entitled to:

    • Cancellation of the bad contract

    • Refund of payments made under the improper second contract

    • Return of down payment and trade-in value

    • Statutory damages under TILA (up to $2,000 per violation in individual cases)

    • Actual damages if the scheme caused financial harm (repossession, credit damage, extra interest, etc.)

    • Attorney’s fees and costs – often recoverable under TILA and state consumer protection laws

    Spot Delivery and Consumer Fraud Claims

    Spot delivery cases are not just financing disputes — they often rise to the level of consumer fraud under both state deceptive practices statutes and federal law.

    How Spot Delivery Can Be Consumer Fraud

    Dealers may engage in fraud or deception when they:

    • Misrepresent financing approval (“You’re approved!” when financing wasn’t finalized)

    • Fail to honor the first binding contract and trick the buyer into signing a second contract

    • Backdate contracts to hide Truth in Lending Act (TILA) violations

    • Conceal or misstate material facts about interest rates, payment terms, or required add-ons

    • Wrongfully dispose of trade-in vehicles before financing is truly complete

    • Threaten repossession unless the consumer signs worse terms

    Each of these tactics can support claims under:

    • State Consumer Fraud Acts / Unfair and Deceptive Acts or Practices (UDAP) statutes

    • Federal TILA and other disclosure laws

    • Common law fraud (misrepresentation, concealment, or inducement into a second contract)

    Evidence That Supports Fraud Claims

    To prove consumer fraud, strong documentation is key:

    • Copies of both contracts (or the single contract plus dealer “conditional delivery” papers)

    • Repair orders or payment receipts showing financial harm

    • Dealer communications (calls, texts, letters pressuring you to return and re-sign)

    • Proof of trade-in disposal (if your old vehicle was sold or auctioned before the deal was final)

    • Inconsistent disclosures between the first and second contracts

    Damages Available Under Consumer Fraud Statutes

    If a spot delivery case is also a consumer fraud case, the remedies can go beyond rescission:

    • Full refund or contract cancellation

    • Return of down payment and trade-in value

    • Statutory damages or penalties under state UDAP laws

    • Treble damages (in some states where fraud was willful or reckless)

    • Attorney’s fees and costs

    Why Combining Lemon Law / TILA and Consumer Fraud Matters

    When a spot delivery case involves both contract violations and fraudulent conduct, you may be entitled to multiple layers of protection.

    • TILA ensures proper financing disclosures.

    • Consumer fraud statutes punish deceptive dealership practices.

    • UDAP claims open the door to punitive or treble damages.

    Together, these claims give consumers a much stronger hand in negotiations and litigation.

    Why You Need an Attorney

    Dealers often count on consumers not realizing their rights under consumer fraud statutes. An experienced Lemon Law and consumer fraud attorney can:

    • Spot fraudulent patterns in your contracts

    • Use state UDAP laws to maximize damages

    • Hold dealers accountable for deceptive practices

    • Pursue claims in both state and federal court

    Common Fact Patterns in Spot Delivery (Yo-Yo Financing) Cases

    Spot delivery cases often follow predictable patterns. Here are the most common ways dealers trick buyers into signing unfair or unlawful contracts:

    1. The “Call Back” Trick

    • You sign a retail installment sales contract and drive off in your new car.

    • A few days later, the dealer calls saying “the financing didn’t go through” or “the bank rejected you.”

    • They pressure you to return and sign a new contract — usually with worse terms: higher interest rate, bigger down payment, or longer loan term.

    🚩 Red flag: The first contract is binding. Dealers can’t just cancel it because they found a better deal for themselves.

    2. The “Backdating” Scam

    • You are asked to sign a second contract, but the dealer backdates it to the date of the first contract.

    • This creates a TILA violation, since federal law requires that all disclosures (APR, total of payments, finance charges) be given at the time the contract is signed.

    • Backdating hides the fact that the first contract was valid and the second one is improper.

    🚩 Red flag: Any second contract dated the same as the first is almost always a sign of fraud.

    3. The “Conditional Delivery” Agreement

    • Dealer gives you a car on the spot with a paper saying “subject to financing approval” or “conditional delivery.”

    • They use this as leverage to later demand changes in the deal.

    • Consumers often think this means they have no rights, but state and federal laws still protect you.

    🚩 Red flag: If you left the dealership with your car but later got pressured into new financing, you may have a yo-yo case.

    4. The “Lost Trade-In” Problem

    • You trade in your old vehicle as part of the first contract.

    • Dealer sells or disposes of your trade-in before the second contract is signed.

    • When you refuse the new contract, your old vehicle is gone — leaving you trapped.

    🚩 Red flag: Dealers are required to safeguard your trade-in until the deal is final. Selling it early is strong evidence of bad faith.

    5. The “Payment Shuffle”

    • You start making payments under the first contract.

    • After being forced into a second contract, you make payments again — sometimes at a higher rate.

    • Dealers rarely refund payments from the first contract.

    🚩 Red flag: Proof of double payments is powerful evidence of damages.

    6. The “Add-On” Switch

    • The second contract contains new add-ons (service contracts, GAP insurance, paint protection) that weren’t in the first contract.

    • Dealers pad the deal to increase their profit while claiming “the bank required it.”

    🚩 Red flag: Banks don’t require add-ons. If these appear only in the second contract, it’s a sign of deceptive practices.

    Why These Patterns Matter

    Spot delivery cases often hinge on showing that the dealer changed the deal after the fact or failed to follow TILA disclosure rules. Recognizing these patterns makes it easier to prove fraud and pursue:

    • Contract rescission

    • Refunds of down payments or trade-ins

    • TILA statutory damages

    • Attorney’s fees and costs

    Think You’ve Experienced One of These Patterns?

    If any of these stories sound like yours, you may have a strong case. The sooner you act, the easier it is to gather the right evidence.

    Why Hire an Attorney for a Spot Delivery Case?

    Dealerships and their finance companies are skilled at defending spot delivery claims. Having an experienced consumer protection and Lemon Law attorney is critical because:

    • We know how to spot contract manipulation (backdating, missing disclosures, altered APRs)

    • We understand TILA and state law remedies and how they interact

    • We can obtain dealer records through discovery to prove fraud

    • We level the playing field against dealerships with corporate lawyers

    • We can often resolve cases with refunds, contract rescission, or damages without going to trial.

    Think You’ve Been a Victim of Spot Delivery?

    If a dealer pressured you into signing a second contract — or if the terms of your financing suddenly changed after you drove off the lot — you may have a spot delivery case.

    📌 Don’t wait: preserving documents and acting quickly is key to proving your claim.

    Contact us at 855-978-6564 to get a free case evaluation.